{"id":2544,"date":"2011-08-29T17:51:21","date_gmt":"2011-08-29T17:51:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.againstchildtrafficking.org\/?p=2544"},"modified":"2011-08-29T17:51:21","modified_gmt":"2011-08-29T17:51:21","slug":"adoption-case-raises-fears-over-trafficking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/adoption-case-raises-fears-over-trafficking\/","title":{"rendered":"Adoption case raises fears over trafficking"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>Source: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.smh.com.au<\/a>\u00a0Geesche Jacobsen<br \/>\nAugust 30, 2011<br \/>\nA FOUR-year old girl who had been informally given to a Sydney couple under a traditional Samoan adoption arrangement should return to her parents in Samoa, the Family Court has ruled.<\/div>\n<p>The girl known as &#8220;S&#8220; had been promised to a childless great aunt and her husband before birth, but had lived with her parents and seven siblings in Samoa until she was nearly two years old.<\/p>\n<p>Within days of delivering S to the couple in western Sydney in February 2009, the girl&#8217;s mother decided she wanted to keep the child. But before she could leave Australia, the couple &#8211; known in court as Mr and Ms Tomas &#8211; had filed proceedings which stopped S from leaving.<\/p>\n<p>Two years later, the court has ruled that it would be best for S &#8211; a happy and healthy child who related to both sets of parents &#8211; to return to Samoa.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>But the case raised wider issues about the entry of children into Australia and highlighted tensions between federal immigration and state-based adoption laws, said Associate Professor Jennifer Burn from the faculty of law at UTS.<\/p>\n<p>S had entered Australia on a New Zealand passport, entitling her to live in Australia without further checks.<\/p>\n<p>The mother&#8217;s lawyers had argued this path could lead to child smuggling or trafficking and said the Tomases had tried to use family law proceedings to &#8220;rectify arrangements that are not acceptable under Australia&#8217;s immigration and adoption laws&#8220;.<\/p>\n<p>Associate Professor Burn said in overseas adoptions cases there should be &#8220;greater scrutiny to ensure that the birth parent freely, without coercion, and in the absence of fraud or any other form of malpractice, surrenders the child for adoption&#8220;.<\/p>\n<p>Lawyers for S&#8217;s mother argued the Samoan &#8220;adoption&#8220; did not meet the requirements for recognition in NSW, but Justice Ian Loughnan found this &#8220;does not make it an illegal adoption&#8220;.<\/p>\n<p>The court ruled that S is to be allowed to speak to the Tomases by telephone twice a week.<\/p>\n<p>Justice Loughnan said all the parents would care for the child well but it was in her best interest that she live within Samoan culture.<br \/>\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source: http:\/\/www.smh.com.au\u00a0Geesche Jacobsen August 30, 2011 A FOUR-year old girl who had been informally given to a Sydney couple under a traditional Samoan adoption arrangement should return to her parents in Samoa, the Family Court has ruled. The girl known as &#8220;S&#8220; had been promised to a childless great aunt and her husband before birth,&#8230;  <a class=\"excerpt-read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/adoption-case-raises-fears-over-trafficking\/\" title=\"Read Adoption case raises fears over trafficking\">Weiter &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2544"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2544"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2544\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2546,"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2544\/revisions\/2546"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2544"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2544"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2544"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}