{"id":3797,"date":"2004-02-04T12:27:09","date_gmt":"2004-02-04T12:27:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.againstchildtrafficking.org\/?p=3797"},"modified":"2013-06-25T13:26:10","modified_gmt":"2013-06-25T13:26:10","slug":"ec-issues-ultimatum-to-romania-stop-child-exports","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/ec-issues-ultimatum-to-romania-stop-child-exports\/","title":{"rendered":"EC issues ultimatum to Romania: stop child exports"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<div>Source:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/news\/worldnews\/europe\/romania\/1453446\/EC-issues-ultimatum-to-Romania-stop-child-exports.html\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div>By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Brussels 04 Feb 2004<\/div>\n<div id=\"mainBodyArea\">\n<div>\n<p>The European Commission has warned Romania to halt the export of children for adoption or face a bar on EU membership and the severance of aid funds.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>The commission wrote to Adrian Nastase, the prime minister, warning that his government&#8217;s conduct failed to meet the &#8222;political criteria&#8220; on human rights required for EU accession. Romania is hoping to join in 2007.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>The unprecedented letter, signed by Gunther Verheugen, the enlargement commissioner, not only threatened to cut off aid but also referred to the need for a &#8222;recovery of funds&#8220; already spent unless Bucharest can account for its actions.<!--more--><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>The dispute comes after Italian reports that Romania had sent 105 children to Italy on dubious pretexts, confirming suspicions in Brussels that the Nastase government is turning a blind eye to racketeering by adoption agencies and corrupt officials.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>Romania imposed a moratorium on adoptions in 2001 at the request of Lady Nicholson, a Liberal-Democrat MEP and the European Parliament&#8217;s &#8222;rapporteur&#8220; on Romania. She said organised crime was exploiting reports about the country&#8217;s orphanages as a &#8222;cover&#8220; for a much wider child-abuse industry.<\/p>\n<p>More than 30,000 children were shipped out for adoption over 10 years, generating hundreds of millions of pounds for agencies and middle men. Each child fetched \u00a320,000 to \u00a335,000.<\/p>\n<p>Few were actually orphans and some were stolen babies. Last month it was disclosed that a maternity hospital at Ploiesti had been tricking mothers by pretending their premature babies died at birth.<\/p>\n<p>The infants were in fact &#8222;fattened&#8220; in a pre-natal wing for six months before being exported. It is claimed that 23 babies were smuggled out by the hospital last year alone.<\/p>\n<p>In other cases, vulnerable young girls were pressured into giving up their babies for as little as \u00a3300 cash.<\/p>\n<p>Lady Nicholson said little had changed since the moratorium was imposed. &#8222;It is a well-oiled machine that seems to rest on a partnership between the adoption agencies and corrupt officials, from top to bottom of the administration. There are wonderful people making huge efforts to stop it but they are not winning.<\/p>\n<p>&#8222;The courts appear to be corrupt. One judge rubber-stamped 92 cases in a single morning. There are no files. Children are just a number in a computer. The agencies get a court order and grab the child. It&#8217;s kidnapping.<\/p>\n<p>&#8222;Some are girls and boys approaching puberty. They are sent off against their will to an unknown future. I shudder to think of their fate. You see advertisements on the internet for pre-pubescent virgins with a $30,000 price tag.&#8220;<\/p>\n<p>Outraged Euro-MPs are demanding that Romania&#8217;s request to join the EU be put on ice. A draft resolution by the European Parliament calls for &#8222;root-and-branch reform of the justice system&#8220; before renewing accession talks.<\/p>\n<p>According to official figures, 1,000 Romanian children have been adopted abroad over the last two years but the real number could be much higher.<\/p>\n<p>Mr Nastase said they were &#8222;pipeline cases&#8220; dating from commitments back to 2001, claiming that foreign parents were already living with the children in Romania.<\/p>\n<p>But Mr Verheugen disputed the claim, noting that most were taken from foster homes or &#8222;other suitable care situations&#8220; in Romania.<\/p>\n<p>An EU official said: &#8222;They were happily settled. Romania is a poor country and so these families don&#8217;t have swimming pools in the yard but foster care is no worse than in any other country.&#8220;<\/p>\n<p>While most adoptive parents in the EU and America offer loving homes, the Commission said lack of tracking data made it impossible to know where children ended up.<\/p>\n<p>&#8222;There is a very big risk that a number fall into the hands of paedophile networks. I didn&#8217;t believe it for a long time but all the evidence points that way,&#8220; said an official.<\/p>\n<p>Romanian officials say they are caught in a tug-of-war between two camps. While one part of the EU demands an adoption ban, Italy, Spain, and France want laxer rules to meet their collapsing fertility rates.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>The commission wrote to Adrian Nastase, the prime minister, warning that his government&#8217;s conduct failed to meet the &#8222;political criteria&#8220; on human rights required for EU accession. Romania is hoping to join in 2007.<\/p>\n<p>The unprecedented letter, signed by Gunther Verheugen, the enlargement commissioner, not only threatened to cut off aid but also referred to the need for a &#8222;recovery of funds&#8220; already spent unless Bucharest can account for its actions.<\/p>\n<p>Officials say \u00a342 million of aid is at risk.<\/p>\n<p>The dispute comes after Italian reports that Romania had sent 105 children to Italy on dubious pretexts, confirming suspicions in Brussels that the Nastase government is turning a blind eye to racketeering by adoption agencies and corrupt officials.<\/p>\n<p>Romania imposed a moratorium on adoptions in 2001 at the request of Lady Nicholson, a Liberal-Democrat MEP and the European Parliament&#8217;s &#8222;rapporteur&#8220; on Romania. She said organised crime was exploiting reports about the country&#8217;s orphanages as a &#8222;cover&#8220; for a much wider child-abuse industry.<\/p>\n<p>More than 30,000 children were shipped out for adoption over 10 years, generating hundreds of millions of pounds for agencies and middle men. Each child fetched \u00a320,000 to \u00a335,000.<\/p>\n<p>Few were actually orphans and some were stolen babies. Last month it was disclosed that a maternity hospital at Ploiesti had been tricking mothers by pretending their premature babies died at birth.<\/p>\n<p>The infants were in fact &#8222;fattened&#8220; in a pre-natal wing for six months before being exported. It is claimed that 23 babies were smuggled out by the hospital last year alone.<\/p>\n<p>In other cases, vulnerable young girls were pressured into giving up their babies for as little as \u00a3300 cash.<\/p>\n<p>Lady Nicholson said little had changed since the moratorium was imposed. &#8222;It is a well-oiled machine that seems to rest on a partnership between the adoption agencies and corrupt officials, from top to bottom of the administration. There are wonderful people making huge efforts to stop it but they are not winning.<\/p>\n<p>&#8222;The courts appear to be corrupt. One judge rubber-stamped 92 cases in a single morning. There are no files. Children are just a number in a computer. The agencies get a court order and grab the child. It&#8217;s kidnapping.<\/p>\n<p>&#8222;Some are girls and boys approaching puberty. They are sent off against their will to an unknown future. I shudder to think of their fate. You see advertisements on the internet for pre-pubescent virgins with a $30,000 price tag.&#8220;<\/p>\n<p>Outraged Euro-MPs are demanding that Romania&#8217;s request to join the EU be put on ice. A draft resolution by the European Parliament calls for &#8222;root-and-branch reform of the justice system&#8220; before renewing accession talks.<\/p>\n<p>According to official figures, 1,000 Romanian children have been adopted abroad over the last two years but the real number could be much higher.<\/p>\n<p>Mr Nastase said they were &#8222;pipeline cases&#8220; dating from commitments back to 2001, claiming that foreign parents were already living with the children in Romania.<\/p>\n<p>But Mr Verheugen disputed the claim, noting that most were taken from foster homes or &#8222;other suitable care situations&#8220; in Romania.<\/p>\n<p>An EU official said: &#8222;They were happily settled. Romania is a poor country and so these families don&#8217;t have swimming pools in the yard but foster care is no worse than in any other country.&#8220;<\/p>\n<p>While most adoptive parents in the EU and America offer loving homes, the Commission said lack of tracking data made it impossible to know where children ended up.<\/p>\n<p>&#8222;There is a very big risk that a number fall into the hands of paedophile networks. I didn&#8217;t believe it for a long time but all the evidence points that way,&#8220; said an official.<\/p>\n<p>Romanian officials say they are caught in a tug-of-war between two camps. While one part of the EU demands an adoption ban, Italy, Spain, and France want laxer rules to meet their collapsing fertility rates.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source:\u00a0http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Brussels 04 Feb 2004 The European Commission has warned Romania to halt the export of children for adoption or face a bar on EU membership and the severance of aid funds. The commission wrote to Adrian Nastase, the prime minister, warning that his government&#8217;s conduct failed to meet the &#8222;political&#8230;  <a class=\"excerpt-read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/ec-issues-ultimatum-to-romania-stop-child-exports\/\" title=\"Read EC issues ultimatum to Romania: stop child exports\">Weiter &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,12],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3797"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3797"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3797\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3805,"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3797\/revisions\/3805"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3797"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3797"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3797"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}