{"id":1040,"date":"2009-11-16T17:29:12","date_gmt":"2009-11-16T17:29:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.againstchildtrafficking.org\/?p=1040"},"modified":"2010-09-03T17:44:46","modified_gmt":"2010-09-03T17:44:46","slug":"australias-rudd-apologizes-to-forced-child-migrants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/australias-rudd-apologizes-to-forced-child-migrants\/","title":{"rendered":"Australia&#8217;s Rudd apologizes to forced child migrants"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div>Source:<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.csmonitor.com\/2009\/1116\/p06s10-woap.html\" target=\"_blank\">www.csmonitor.com\/<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<table id=\"mainPhoto\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div id=\"storyContent\">Australia Prime Minister Kevin Rudd formally apologized  to the thousands of institutionalized children and child migrants  shipped from Britain to rebuild Australia after World War II. Many were  abused. <\/p>\n<address><strong>By Kathy Marks<\/strong> | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor <!--more--><\/address>\n<p>from the November 16, 2009 edition&lt;!&#8211; end story tools&#8211;&gt;&lt;!&#8211;endclickprintexclude&#8211;&gt;<\/p>\n<p>Sydney &#8211; Australian Prime Minister  Kevin Rudd on Monday apologized to hundreds of thousands of children  abused or neglected in institutions, including some 7,000 British  children shipped to Australia after World War II. Sometimes called &#8220;the  orphans of Empire,&#8221; they received the formal apology after decades of  campaigning for recognition. As with his government&#8217;s previous  apologies, many of the victims here welcomed the gesture, while others  expressed a desire to see more practical steps taken to overcome their  losses.<\/p>\n<p>Inside Parliament House in Canberra, the nation&#8217;s capital, about 900  of the former child migrants gathered in the audience to hear Mr. Rudd  deliver words of contrition. The prime minister told them: &#8220;We come  together today to offer our nation&#8217;s apology, to say to you, the  forgotten Australians, and those who were sent to our shores as children  without their consent, that we are sorry. Sorry that as children you  were taken from your families and placed in institutions where so often  you were abused. Sorry for the physical suffering, the emotional  starvation, and the cold absence of love, of tenderness, of care. Sorry  for the tragedy, the absolute tragedy, of childhoods lost.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&lt;!&#8211;startclickprintexclude&#8211;&gt;&lt;!&#8211;endclickprintexclude&#8211;&gt;<\/p>\n<p>Among those listening to the apology \u2013 which followed one delivered by Mr. Rudd last year to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.csmonitor.com\/2008\/0212\/p07s02-woap.html\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Stolen Generations&#8221;<\/a> of Aboriginal children forcibly removed from their families \u2013 was Mick  Snell, who has bleak memories of his time in a Methodist-run children&#8217;s  home in Sydney.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Snell arrived in Australia under a postwar plan to empty British  orphanages and repopulate the former colony with &#8220;good white stock.&#8221; The  children, who were shipped out from 1947-67, believed their parents  were dead. In reality, Mr. Snell&#8217;s unmarried mother had been forced to  give him up as a baby. That was the case with many of the &#8220;orphans;&#8221;  others had been placed in care by impoverished families.<\/p>\n<p>Parliamentary inquiries in Britain and Australia in the past decade  concluded that physical and sexual abuse were &#8220;widespread and  systematic&#8221; in the institutions, particularly those run by Catholic  orders such as the Christian Brothers and Sisters of Mercy. The  inquiries heard that many former child migrants, now in their 60s and  70s, are still deeply traumatized.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;For my kids to understand&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>For some, Rudd&#8217;s apology \u2013 which was also extended to Australian  children who were abused and neglected in institutions \u2013 was a step  forward. Speaking before traveling to Canberra, Snell said: &#8220;All I want  is for them to admit it was wrong, and for my kids to be able to  understand me a bit better.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>For others, the gesture represented too little, too late. &#8220;I wonder  how they think making an apology can right the wrong that was done,&#8221;  said Jean Costello.<\/p>\n<p>Ms. Costello was just seven when she was sent to an orphanage in  Perth run by the Sisters of Mercy. She had left England with  expectations of a country where &#8220;everyone was black and there&#8217;d be  animals hopping down the street.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The reality wasn&#8217;t what she had imagined. Of her new home, Costello  recalls: &#8220;It was a very hard, very cold sort of environment, and you  learnt very early that it was easier to toe the line than go against it.  The nuns were pretty free and easy with the strap, and you didn&#8217;t have  to do much to merit a beating.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Coming British apology?<\/p>\n<p>Redress has been slow, and piecemeal. In recent years, several  Australian state governments have apologized, as has the Catholic  Church. Some states have offered compensation and counseling services;  in others, services have been virtually non-existent. Both Britain and  Australia provided funds to help people travel back to Britain to trace  their families, but the money was limited and many missed out.<\/p>\n<p>Some migrants learned that their parents had tried to seek them,  without success \u2013 either because their names were changed when they  arrived in Australia, or because parents were told by British  authorities that their children were dead or had been adopted by wealthy  families.<\/p>\n<p>Returning to Britain, Costello found out \u2013 too late \u2013 that both her  parents had lived well into their 70s. Of those responsible for her  welfare, she says: &#8220;They deprived me of ever knowing my mum and dad.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>There are calls for Britain to apologize, too \u2013 and, after years of  turning a deaf ear, the government recently hinted that it may follow  Australia&#8217;s example.<\/p>\n<p>Some good intentions<\/p>\n<p>Yet historical records suggest that the policy of sending children to  the other side of the world stemmed at the time from good intentions.  Britain believed they would fare better than in cash-starved orphanages  at home. Australia, meanwhile, was desperate to rebuild its population  after suffering heavy war casualties. The children were cheap to house,  and a ready source of labor.<\/p>\n<p>And, importantly for Australia, they were white; this was an era when  Australia feared being overwhelmed by &#8220;Asian hordes&#8221; from neighboring  countries.<\/p>\n<p>The institutions, though, were not properly inspected, and staff were  mostly untrained and poorly supervised. The official inquiries heard  that funds provided by the government for the children&#8217;s upkeep were  sometimes used to feed staff well, while the children were given scraps.<\/p>\n<p>The homes also attracted pedophiles. Many children \u2013 the exact  proportion is unknown \u2013 have said they were sexually abused. Others have  described miserable, lonely lives, during which birthdays and  Christmases went unmarked, and they never received any affection.<\/p>\n<p>Laurie Humphreys, a former migrant, says: &#8220;We&#8217;re all survivors, but  emotionally it&#8217;s had a long-lasting effect. It has affected our  relationships; many of us have been divorced, and people have turned to  alcoholism. People&#8217;s lives have been ruined by what&#8217;s happened to them.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source: www.csmonitor.com\/ Australia Prime Minister Kevin Rudd formally apologized to the thousands of institutionalized children and child migrants shipped from Britain to rebuild Australia after World War II. Many were abused. By Kathy Marks | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1040"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1040"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1040\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1042,"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1040\/revisions\/1042"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1040"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1040"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.againstchildtrafficking.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1040"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}